<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: &#8220;Vaccinating boys for girls&#8217; sake&#8221;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://dourapple.wordpress.com/2008/02/25/vaccinating-boys-for-girls-sake/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://dourapple.wordpress.com/2008/02/25/vaccinating-boys-for-girls-sake/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 19 Oct 2008 16:43:09 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Greenville IT Support</title>
		<link>http://dourapple.wordpress.com/2008/02/25/vaccinating-boys-for-girls-sake/#comment-53</link>
		<dc:creator>Greenville IT Support</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 19 Oct 2008 16:40:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dourapple.wordpress.com/?p=20#comment-53</guid>
		<description>I haven&#039;t read the statistics, but I would suppose based on the initial marketing, that in fact the amount of cervical cancers that it would prevent would outweigh the number of other cancers and other diseases that it would prevent.

If that is in fact the case, then arguments based on altruism are in fact the most valid as the prevention of the other diseases may not make economic sense.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I haven&#8217;t read the statistics, but I would suppose based on the initial marketing, that in fact the amount of cervical cancers that it would prevent would outweigh the number of other cancers and other diseases that it would prevent.</p>
<p>If that is in fact the case, then arguments based on altruism are in fact the most valid as the prevention of the other diseases may not make economic sense.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michelle Holbert</title>
		<link>http://dourapple.wordpress.com/2008/02/25/vaccinating-boys-for-girls-sake/#comment-14</link>
		<dc:creator>Michelle Holbert</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Feb 2008 22:25:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dourapple.wordpress.com/?p=20#comment-14</guid>
		<description>This is the same question I have been asking myself for a long time. Why do women always have to take the responsibility of using oral contraceptives? Why can&#039;t they make a birth control for men and they have to remember to take it everyday? Why does it always have to be the womens responsibility? I think it is a great idea to create the Gardasil vaccination for men and women. As long as they keep it as an option. Men should have the right to choose to receive this vaccination as well! If  this does become mandatory... (which I hope not)  vaccination then men need to carry the burden of receiving this very painful three shot series as well!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is the same question I have been asking myself for a long time. Why do women always have to take the responsibility of using oral contraceptives? Why can&#8217;t they make a birth control for men and they have to remember to take it everyday? Why does it always have to be the womens responsibility? I think it is a great idea to create the Gardasil vaccination for men and women. As long as they keep it as an option. Men should have the right to choose to receive this vaccination as well! If  this does become mandatory&#8230; (which I hope not)  vaccination then men need to carry the burden of receiving this very painful three shot series as well!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ruby</title>
		<link>http://dourapple.wordpress.com/2008/02/25/vaccinating-boys-for-girls-sake/#comment-13</link>
		<dc:creator>Ruby</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Feb 2008 20:22:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dourapple.wordpress.com/?p=20#comment-13</guid>
		<description>I think the biggest issue with Gardasil that people have is that it&#039;s so new and long-term studies have never been done on it. HepB is an STD, yeah, and we&#039;re vaccinating 1-day old infants with it, which I don&#039;t think is right, either.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think the biggest issue with Gardasil that people have is that it&#8217;s so new and long-term studies have never been done on it. HepB is an STD, yeah, and we&#8217;re vaccinating 1-day old infants with it, which I don&#8217;t think is right, either.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kahley Emerson</title>
		<link>http://dourapple.wordpress.com/2008/02/25/vaccinating-boys-for-girls-sake/#comment-11</link>
		<dc:creator>Kahley Emerson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Feb 2008 23:40:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dourapple.wordpress.com/?p=20#comment-11</guid>
		<description>I think the general public will eventually accept Gardasil (or its subsequent generic/competing drugs) as just another scientific advantage against disease. People just sometimes have a hard time looking at things like sex realistically and rationally.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think the general public will eventually accept Gardasil (or its subsequent generic/competing drugs) as just another scientific advantage against disease. People just sometimes have a hard time looking at things like sex realistically and rationally.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
